<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Fibroids: A Gynecologist&#039;s Second Opinion &#187; best imaging</title> <atom:link href="http://www.fibroidsecondopinion.com/tag/best-imaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.fibroidsecondopinion.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator> <item><title>Which is a better method of finding fibroids: MRI or Ultrasound?</title><link>http://www.fibroidsecondopinion.com/2009/06/finding-fibroids/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=finding-fibroids</link> <comments>http://www.fibroidsecondopinion.com/2009/06/finding-fibroids/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:54:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Bill Parker, MD</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Recent Fibroid Research]]></category> <category><![CDATA[best imaging]]></category> <category><![CDATA[diagnosis]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fibroids]]></category> <category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ultrasound]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://fibroidsecondopinion.com.s55615.gridserver.com/?p=47</guid> <description><![CDATA[MRI is more accurate than ultrasound when you need to know the exact number, position and sizes of fibroids. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[endif]--></p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasound for determining fibroid burden: implications for research and clinical care.</strong></p><p class="MsoNormal">Authors: Levens ED, Wesley R, Premkumar A, Blocker W, Nieman LK.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):537.e1-7. Epub 2009 Mar 9.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Study performed by: Program in Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Problem</strong>: The authors want to determine whether MRI or Ultrasound is better at finding fibroids.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Study</strong>: 18 women had both an MRI and an ultrasound before they had a hysterectomy. The uterus was then inspected by the pathologist to determine how many fibroids were present and these results were compared to what the MRI and ultrasounds had predicted.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Results</strong>: MRI found 80% of the fibroids, while ultrasound found only 40% of the fibroids.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Conclusions</strong>: MRI was superior to ultrasound for fibroid assessment.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Dr. Parker’s Comment: </strong>This study confirms what other studies have previously shown – that MRI is the best way to “see” fibroids before choosing a treatment or surgery. I find MRI particularly helpful if a patient wants a laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy.<span> </span>By looking at the MRI images myself, I know exactly where all the fibroids are, and whether they can all be removed during surgery.<span> </span>I have also had a number of women who were discovered to have fibroids inside the uterine cavity that were not seen with ultrasound.<span> </span>These women had all been told they needed an abdominal myomectomy or a hysterectomy, but were able to have a hysteroscopic myomectomy, the least invasive procedure with the fastest recovery.</p><p class="MsoNormal">MRI is not always necessary, though.<span> </span>If many fibroids are found with ultrasound and the uterus is very large, usually abdominal myomectomy is going to be the only successful way to take all the fibroids out.<span> </span>So, MRI will add nothing useful because I will be able to feel all the fibroids during surgery and know where they are.<span> </span>Also, if a woman wants to have a laparoscopic hysterectomy, then it is not necessary to know where the individual fibroids are since they will all be removed with the uterus.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.fibroidsecondopinion.com/2009/06/finding-fibroids/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/15 queries in 0.142 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fibroidsecondopinion.com

Served from: www.fibroidsecondopinion.com @ 2012-02-05 16:49:30 -->
